Skip to main content

Safety/Ethics Prompts

Safety and ethics prompting explicitly guides the language model to behave in a safe, responsible, and ethical manner, addressing concerns such as bias, fairness, and harmful outputs.

Key Concepts​

  • Harm Prevention: Prompts are designed to avoid generating unsafe, offensive, or harmful content.
  • Bias Mitigation: Explicitly instructs the model to avoid stereotypes, discrimination, or unfair assumptions.
  • Transparency: Encourages clear, honest, and explainable outputs.
  • Ethical Alignment: Aligns model behavior with ethical guidelines, legal requirements, and community standards.

Best Practices​

  1. Explicit Safety Instructions

    • Clearly state what types of content are prohibited.
    • Instruct the model to refuse unsafe or unethical requests.

  2. Bias Awareness

    • Remind the model to avoid stereotypes and treat all groups fairly.
    • Use neutral, inclusive language.

  3. Contextual Safeguards

    • Provide context about sensitive topics or vulnerable populations.
    • Set boundaries for what the model should and should not address.

  4. Review and Monitor Outputs

    • Regularly audit model responses for safety and ethical compliance.
    • Use human-in-the-loop review for high-risk applications.

Examples​

Refusal to Answer Harmful Requests​

If asked to provide instructions for illegal or dangerous activities, respond: "I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that request."

Bias Mitigation​

When generating job descriptions, ensure language is gender-neutral and inclusive. Avoid stereotypes or assumptions about any group.

Sensitive Topic Handling​

If discussing mental health, provide supportive information and encourage seeking help from qualified professionals. Do not offer medical advice or diagnoses.

Common Pitfalls​

  1. Ambiguous Safety Instructions

    • Vague or incomplete guidance may not prevent unsafe outputs.

  2. Overlooking Subtle Bias

    • Bias can appear in tone, examples, or assumptions even with explicit instructions.

  3. Inconsistent Enforcement

    • Failing to review outputs regularly can allow unsafe or unethical content to slip through.

Use Cases​

  1. Content Moderation

    • Filtering or flagging unsafe, offensive, or inappropriate outputs.

  2. Sensitive Application Domains

    • Healthcare, legal, or financial advice where safety and ethics are paramount.

  3. Public-facing AI Systems

    • Chatbots, virtual assistants, or educational tools interacting with diverse users.

When to Use Safety/Ethics Prompts​

Safety/ethics prompting is essential when:

  • Outputs could impact user well-being, safety, or rights.
  • The application is public-facing or high-stakes.
  • There is a risk of bias, discrimination, or harm.

When to Consider Alternatives​

Consider additional safeguards when:

  • The model's built-in safety features are insufficient.
  • Legal or regulatory requirements demand stricter controls.
  • Human review is required for critical decisions.

Tips for Optimization​

  1. Iterative Testing

    • Test prompts with edge cases and adversarial inputs.
    • Refine based on observed failures or near-misses.

  2. Layered Safeguards

    • Combine prompt-based instructions with automated filters and human review.

  3. Transparency and Documentation

    • Document safety/ethics prompt strategies and update them as new risks emerge.